Effects of outer mouth mutations on hERG channel function: A comparison with similar mutations in the Shaker channel

Citation
Js. Fan et al., Effects of outer mouth mutations on hERG channel function: A comparison with similar mutations in the Shaker channel, BIOPHYS J, 76(6), 1999, pp. 3128-3140
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00063495 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3128 - 3140
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-3495(199906)76:6<3128:EOOMMO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The fast-inactivation process in the hERG channel can be affected by mutati ons in the pore or S6 domain, similar to the C-type inactivation in the Sha ker channel. However, differences in the kinetics and voltage dependence of inactivation between these two channels suggest that different structural determinants may be involved. To explore this possibility, we mutated a ser ine in the outer mouth region of hERG (S631) to residues of different physi cochemical properties and compared the resulting changes in the channel's i nactivation process with those resulting from mutations of an equivalent po sition in the Shaker channel (T449), The most dramatic differences are seen when this position Is occupied by a charged residue: S631K and S631E disru pted C-type inactivation in hERG, whereas T449K and T449E facilitate C-type inactivation in Shaker. S631K and S631E also disrupted the K selectivity o f hERG pore, a change not seen in T449K or T449E of Shaker. To further stud y why there are such differences, we replaced S631 with cysteine. This allo wed us to manipulate the properties of thiol groups at position 631 and cor relate side-chain properties here with changes in channel function. S631C b ehaved like the wild-type channel when the thiol groups were in the reduced state. Oxidizing thiol groups with H2O2 or modifying them with MTSET or MT SES disrupted C-type inactivation and K selectivity, similar to the phenoty pe of S631K and S631E, The same thiol-modifying maneuvers did not affect th e wild-type channel function. Our results suggest differences in the outer mouth structure between hERG and Shaker, and we propose a "molecular spring " hypothesis to explain these differences.