False negative clinical diagnoses of malignant melanoma

Citation
Je. Osborne et al., False negative clinical diagnoses of malignant melanoma, BR J DERM, 140(5), 1999, pp. 902-908
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
140
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
902 - 908
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(199905)140:5<902:FNCDOM>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
The false negative rate for the clinical diagnosis (FNR) for malignant mela noma is reported to be of the order of 20-50%. The aim of this study was to investigate possible predictor variables for FNR, with particular referenc e to the features and score of the seven-point check-list within the total population (778) of histologically proved malignant melanomas presenting in Leicestershire between 1982 and 1996. The FNR was 18.5%. The check-list wo uld have failed as a referral indication in only 0.8-1.1% of the lesions. T he major check-list features occurred more commonly than the minor features , excepting size greater than or equal to 7 mm, confirming the diagnostic i mportance of the major criteria. The FNR was unaffected by age or sex. More rarely involved sites had higher rates (31-42%), and the face was a partic ularly difficult diagnostic site. Clinical features of lesions associated w ith a higher FNR were lack of irregular pigmentation and shape, altered sen sation, the presence of inflammation and size < 7 mm. The FNR was inversely related to the total score and major feature score, but directly related t o the minor score. The minor features, in addition to the major features, a re potentially valuable in avoiding false negative diagnoses and we suggest their retention as part of the check-list, There was only one patient, in whom the diagnosis of melanoma was initially missed and who was not biopsie d on presentation to hospital, who re-presented after 1 year. However, the study illustrates the importance of avoiding a false negative diagnosis as there was marked delay in the excision of such lesions.