Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial
G. Feder et al., Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial, BR MED J, 318(7197), 1999, pp. 1522-1526
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Objectives To determine whether postal prompts to patients who have Survive
d an acute coronary event and to their general practitioners improve second
ary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Design Randomised controlled trial.
Setting 52 general practices in east London, 44 of which had received facil
itation of local guidelines for coronary heart disease.
Participants 328 patients admitted to hospital for myocardial infarctionor
unstable angina.
Interventions Postal prompts sent 2 weeks and 3 months after discharge from
hospital. The prompts contained recommendations for lowering the risk of a
nother coronary event, including changes to lifestyle, drug treatment, and
making an appointment to discuss these issues with the general practitioner
or practice nurse.
Main outcome measures Proportion of patients: in whom serum cholesterol con
centrations were measured; proportion of patients prescribed beta blockers
(6 months after discharge); and proportion of patients prescribed cholester
ol lowering drugs (1 year after discharge).
Results Prescribing of beta bockers (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interva
l 0.8 to 3.0, P > 0.05) and cholesterol lowering drugs (1.7., 0.8 to 3.4, P
> 0.05) did not differ between intervention and control groups: A higher p
roportion of patients in the intervention group (64%) than in the control g
roup (38%) had their serum cholesterol concentrations measured (2.9, 1.5 to
5.5, P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were significantly improved for consul
tations for coronary heart disease, the recording of risk factors, and advi
ce given. There were no significant differences in patients' self reported
changes to lifestyle: or to the belief that it is possible to modify the ri
sk of another coronary event
Conclusions,Postal prompts to patients who had had acute coronary events an
d to their general practitioners in a locality where guidelines for coronar
y heart disease had been disseminated did not improve prescribing of effect
ive drugs for secondary prevention or self reported changes to lifestyle. T
he prompts did increase consultation,rates related to. 1 coronary heart dis
ease and the recording of risk factors in the practices. Effective secondar
y prevention of coronary heart disease requires more than postal prompts an
d the dissemination of guidelines.