This study generated normative data for the free and fixed conditions of th
e Design Fluency Test (DFT; Jones-Gotman & Milner, 1977) and investigated i
ts interrater reliability. Three raters independently scored DFT protocols
from 66 normal adults according to criteria that have only recently been pu
blished (Jones-Gotman, 1990; see Spreen & Strauss, 1998 for summary). Inter
rater reliability was good to excellent for novel output scores and perseve
rative errors, but nameable errors and designs with the incorrect number of
lines yielded lower reliability coefficients. Overall, interrater reliabil
ity of the DFT appears to be relatively good, especially for the free condi
tion and, therefore, clinical use with adequate normative data may be justi
fied.