Bh. Ross et Gl. Murphy, Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain, COG PSYCHOL, 38(4), 1999, pp. 495-553
Seven studies examined how people represent, access, and make inferences ab
out a rich real-world category domain, foods. The representation of the cat
egory was assessed by category generation, category ratings, and item sorti
ngs. The first results indicated that the high-level category of foods was
organized simultaneously by taxonomic categories for the kind of food (e.g.
, vegetables, meats) and script categories for the situations in which food
s are eaten (e.g., breakfast foods, snacks). Sortings were dominated by the
taxonomic categories, but the script categories also had an influence. The
access of the categories was examined both by a similarity rating task, wi
th and without the category labels, and by a speeded priming experiment. In
both studies, the script categories showed less access than the taxonomic
categories, but more than novel ad hoc categories, suggesting some intermed
iate level of access. Two studies on induction found that both types of cat
egories could be used to make a wide range of inferences about food propert
ies, but that they were differentially useful for different kinds of infere
nces. The results give a detailed picture of the use of cross-classificatio
n in a complex domain, demonstrating that multiple categories and ways of c
ategorizing can be used in a single domain at one time. (C) 1999 Academic P
ress.