Geochemistry and textures of gold-bearing arsenian pyrite, Twin Creeks, Nevada: Implications for deposition of gold in Carlin-type deposits

Citation
G. Simon et al., Geochemistry and textures of gold-bearing arsenian pyrite, Twin Creeks, Nevada: Implications for deposition of gold in Carlin-type deposits, ECON GEOL B, 94(3), 1999, pp. 405-421
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND THE BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS
ISSN journal
03610128 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
405 - 421
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-0128(199905)94:3<405:GATOGA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
This study relates morphology, size, texture, and chemistry of arsenian pyr ite in the Twin Creeks Carlin-type gold deposits to the chemical position a nd amount of gold that it contains. Arsenian pyrite is confirmed as the mos t important gold-hosting mineral and four types of gold-bearing arsenian py rite are recognized. Among these four types, the lowest amount of gold and arsenic (<1 wt % As; 17-60 ppm Au) is contained in arsenian pyrite with rel atively large grain sizes (10-30 mu m) It formed at relatively high tempera tures (250 degrees C) and K+/H+ ratios (adularia stable), probably relative ly slowly The largest amount of gold and arsenic (1.05-2.43 wt % As; 595-1, 465 ppm Au) is contained in arsenian pyrite with small grain sizes (up to 2 mu m) that formed at low temperatures (120 degrees-200 degrees C) and mode rate K+/H+ ratios (illite stable), probably by relatively rapid deposition. XANES, EXAFS, and SIMS analyses show that gold in arsenian pyrite is both s tructurally bound (Au-I) and in submicroscopic inclusions of free gold (Au- 0). Highest amounts of structurally bound gold were observed in the relativ ely coarse-grained arsenian pyrite noted above, whereas most inclusions of free gold were observed in fine-grained arsenian pyrite. In general, there is a good correlation between gold and arsenic in arsenian pyrite, although Au/As ratios vary from one pyrite to another. It is suggested that gold in arsenian pyrite was deposited by direct deposition of native gold and by a dsorption of Au-I from hydrothermal solutions. Adsorption of gold by arseni an pyrite can take place from solutions that are not saturated with respect to native gold. Relative volumes of gold-bearing pyrite from different par agenetic stages at Twin Creeks suggest that as much as 50 percent of the to tal gold in the deposit could have formed from solutions that were not satu rated with respect to native gold. Because both Au-0 and Au-I are found together in arsenian pyrite, it is lik ely that they were deposited by the same process. Consideration of possible depositional reactions suggests that a decrease in the activity of reduced sulfur is most likely to cause gold deposition.