Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body- fixed axes

Citation
Wg. Darling et Jm. Hondzinski, Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body- fixed axes, EXP BRAIN R, 126(3), 1999, pp. 417-430
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00144819 → ACNP
Volume
126
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
417 - 430
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(199906)126:3<417:KPOEAB>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The major purpose of this research was to determine whether kinesthetic/pro prioceptive perceptions of the earth-fixed vertical axis are more accurate than perceptions of intrinsic axes. In one experiment, accuracy of alignmen t of the forearm to earth-fixed vertical and head- and trunk-longitudinal a xes by seven blindfolded subjects was compared in four tasks: (1) Earth-Arm - arm(humerus) orientation was manipulated by the experimenter; subjects a ligned the forearm parallel to the vertical axis, which was also aligned wi th the head and trunk longitudinal axis; (2) Head - head, trunk, and upper- limb orientations were manipulated by the experimenter, subjects aligned th e forearm parallel to the longitudinal axis of the head using only elbow fl exion/extension and shoulder internal/external rotation; (3) Trunk - same a s (2), except that subjects aligned the forearm parallel to the trunk-longi tudinal axis; (4) Earth - same as (2), except that subjects aligned the for earm parallel to the earth-fixed vertical. Head, trunk, and gravitational a xes were never parallel in tasks 2, 3, and 4 so that subjects could not sim ultaneously match their forearm to all three axes. The results showed that the errors for alignment of the forearm with the earth-fixed vertical were lower than for the trunk- and head-longitudinal axes. Furthermore, errors i n the Earth condition were less dependent on alterations of the head and tr unk orientation than in the Head and Trunk conditions. These data strongly suggest that the earth-fixed vertical is used as one axis for the kinesthet ic sensory coordinate system that specifies upper-limb orientation at the p erceptual level. We also examined the effects of Varying gravitational torq ues at the elbow and shoulder on the accuracy of forearm alignment to earth -fixed axes. Adding a 450 g load to the forearm to increase gravitational t orques when the forearm is not vertical did not improve the accuracy of for earm alignment with the vertical. Furthermore, adding small, variably sized loads (between which the subjects could not distinguish at the perceptual level) to the forearm just proximal to the wrist produced similar errors in aligning the forearm with the vertical and horizontal. Forearm-positioning errors were not correlated with the size of the load, as would be expected if gravitational torques affected forearm-position sense. We conclude that gravitational torques exerted about the shoulder and elbow do not make sig nificant contributions to sensing forearm-orientation relative to earth-fix ed axes when the upper-limb segments are not constrained by external suppor ts.