Universal linkage system: An improved method for labeling archival DNA forcomparative genomic hybridization

Citation
Jc. Alers et al., Universal linkage system: An improved method for labeling archival DNA forcomparative genomic hybridization, GENE CHROM, 25(3), 1999, pp. 301-305
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
ISSN journal
10452257 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
301 - 305
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-2257(199907)25:3<301:ULSAIM>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has become a powerful technique for studying gains and losses of DNA sequences in solid tumors. Importantly, D NA derived from archival tumor tissue is also applicable in CGH analysis. H owever, DNA isolated from routinely processed, formalin-fixed, paraffin-emb edded tissue is often degraded, with the bulk of DNA showing fragment sizes of only 400-750 bp. Enzymatic labeling of archival DNA by standard nick tr anslation (NT) decreases DNA size even further, until it becomes too small for CGH (<300 bp). This study presents application in CGH of a commercially available, non-enzymatic labeling method, called Universal Linkage System (ULS), that leaves the DNA fragment size intact. To compare the effect of c hemical labeling of archival DNA by ULS vs. enzymatic by NT on the quality of CGH, DNA derived from 16 tumors was labeled by both ULS and NT. In those cases (n = 8), in which the bulk of DNA had a fragment size of 400- 1,000 bp, CCH was successful with ULS-labeled probes, but not with NT-labeled pro bes, In the DNA samples (n = 6) with a fragment size > 1 kb, the intensity of CGH signals was comparable for both ULS- and NT-labeled probes, but CGH with ULS-labeled samples showed a high, speckled, background, which serious ly hampered image analysis. In the remaining two cases, which had evenly di stributed DNA fragment sites (range 250-5,000 bp), CGH was successful with both labeling methods. Using DNA fragment size < 1 kb as a selection criter ion for ULS labeling, we were able to obtain good quality CGH of a large pa nel (n = 77) of a variety of archival solid tumors. We conclude that ULS is an excellent labeling method for performing CGH on small-fragment-sized DN A. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.