Jc. Alers et al., Universal linkage system: An improved method for labeling archival DNA forcomparative genomic hybridization, GENE CHROM, 25(3), 1999, pp. 301-305
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has become a powerful technique for
studying gains and losses of DNA sequences in solid tumors. Importantly, D
NA derived from archival tumor tissue is also applicable in CGH analysis. H
owever, DNA isolated from routinely processed, formalin-fixed, paraffin-emb
edded tissue is often degraded, with the bulk of DNA showing fragment sizes
of only 400-750 bp. Enzymatic labeling of archival DNA by standard nick tr
anslation (NT) decreases DNA size even further, until it becomes too small
for CGH (<300 bp). This study presents application in CGH of a commercially
available, non-enzymatic labeling method, called Universal Linkage System
(ULS), that leaves the DNA fragment size intact. To compare the effect of c
hemical labeling of archival DNA by ULS vs. enzymatic by NT on the quality
of CGH, DNA derived from 16 tumors was labeled by both ULS and NT. In those
cases (n = 8), in which the bulk of DNA had a fragment size of 400- 1,000
bp, CCH was successful with ULS-labeled probes, but not with NT-labeled pro
bes, In the DNA samples (n = 6) with a fragment size > 1 kb, the intensity
of CGH signals was comparable for both ULS- and NT-labeled probes, but CGH
with ULS-labeled samples showed a high, speckled, background, which serious
ly hampered image analysis. In the remaining two cases, which had evenly di
stributed DNA fragment sites (range 250-5,000 bp), CGH was successful with
both labeling methods. Using DNA fragment size < 1 kb as a selection criter
ion for ULS labeling, we were able to obtain good quality CGH of a large pa
nel (n = 77) of a variety of archival solid tumors. We conclude that ULS is
an excellent labeling method for performing CGH on small-fragment-sized DN
A. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.