Objective To evaluate che outcomes of a one-stop menstrual disorder clinic
and to determine its acceptability to patients.
Design A two-part audit including a retrospective analysis of data from pat
ients' records, and a prospective study of patients' views of the service.
Setting The Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Subjects and methods Audit I involved a manual and computer-assisted search
of the records of patients who attended between 1 May and 31 October, 1990
, fur data collection and retrospective analysis. Audit II was based on the
replies to anonymous printed questionnaires, completed after the consultat
ion, by patients who attended the clinic between 1 January and 31 March 199
7.
Results Audit I: A total of 188 records (95%) were traced and audited. The
mean waiting time to consultation was 5.5 weeks, The most common indication
for patient referral was postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) (32.2%), followed b
y intermenstrual bleeding (30.5%) and menorrhagia (12.6%), a combination of
which was most prevalent among women aged 41-50 years (90.7%). Out-patient
hysteroscopy was successful in 92.6% of patients. The most common patholog
y was an endometrial polyp. There were two cases of endometrial carcinoma.
Additional procedures at a later stage under general anaesthetic were neede
d by 25 patients. The difference in costs over 6 months between the out-pat
ient one-stop service and the traditional referral system following in-pati
ent treatment was pound 31 000. Audit II: Although nine out of every 10 pat
ients experienced moderate discomfort, there was overwhelming patient satis
faction with all aspects of the service.
Conclusion The one-stop out-patient service is successful, rapidly accessib
le, safe and convenient, and is more cost-effective than the service offere
d through the traditional referral system. Our study also indicates that th
e service is applicable to other gynaecological problems, such as assessmen
t of the endometrium as part of the investigation for infertility.