It is proposed that the existing relationship between the influencing agent
and the target of influence plays a central role in the choice of using ha
rd and soft influence tactics. In a field study, 3 key aspects of the relat
ion between agent and target were examined, and the results generally suppo
rted our hypotheses. First, the more unfairly people felt they were treated
the more often they wielded influence, especially using harder influence t
actics. Second, the better the influencing agent liked the target, the rela
tively less often he or she used hard tactics. Finally, the more the influe
ncing agent felt dependent upon the target, the fewer influence tactics, bo
th hard and soft, were used. The discussion focuses on both the practical a
nd theoretical implications of these findings.