A. Peretz et al., Evaluation of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women with and without fractures, J CLIN DENS, 2(2), 1999, pp. 127-133
Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered a gold standard for bone meas
urements in the assessment of osteoporosis. Other techniques such as quanti
tative ultrasound (QUS) are promising to detect patients with osteoporosis-
related fractures and to predict fracture risk. In this cross-sectional ret
rospective study, we analyzed the behavior of QUS and DXA measurements alon
e and in combination with regard to the presence of fractures in 320 women,
147 with nontraumatic fractures. Speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasoun
d attenuation (BUA), and a third parameter derived from SOS and BUA caned s
tiffness were measured at the calcaneus using an Achilles device (Lunar, Ma
dison, WI). Lumbar (BMDL) and hip (BMDH) bone mineral density were measured
by DXA (Hologic QDR 1000, Waltham, MA). Mean SOS, BUA, stiffness, and BMDL
and BMDH were significantly lower in women with fractures compared with wo
men without fractures. Logistic regression adjusted for age identified stif
fness as the parameter most strongly associated with the presence of fractu
re: its sensitivity was 54% and specificity 70%. Hip BMD was second, with a
sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 69%. Combining QUS and DXA measure
ments did not improve the specificity nor the sensitivity. There was no dif
ference in the odds ratios with regard to the technique that was chosen for
bone assessment. In conclusion, these results suggest that low QUS measure
ments are associated with the presence of fractures in a way similar to DXA
. In our study, the combination of QUS and DXA did not improve the discrimi
nation of women with fractures.