The previous articles in this special section make the case for the importa
nce of evaluating the clinical significance of therapeutic change, present
key measures and innovative ways in which they are applied. and more genera
lly provide important guidelines for evaluating therapeutic change. Fundame
ntal issues raised by the concept of clinical significance and the methods
discussed in the previous articles serve as the basis of the present commen
ts. Salient among these issues are ambiguities regarding the meaning of cur
rent measures of clinical significance, the importance of relating assessme
nt of clinical significance to the goals of therapy, and evaluation of the
construct(s) that clinical significance reflects. Research directions that
are discussed include developing a typology of therapy goals, evaluating cu
toff scores and thresholds for clinical significance, and attending to soci
al as well as clinical impact of treatment.