Across 4 experiments, recency arising from the presentation of 5-item tacti
le lists was assessed with immediate and delayed recall with or without a s
ame-modality suffix. The lists were presented with or without concurrent ve
rbalization and at rates varying from 0.5 s to 2 s per item. Delaying recal
l or the addition of a suffix impaired recency both in the absence of concu
rrent verbalization during list presentation and at the 1-s presentation ra
te. In contrast, both concurrent verbalization during list presentation and
a 0.5-s presentation rate restored recency for both the delayed recall and
suffix conditions. This pattern of data is problematic for sensory memory
and for trace discriminability accounts of modality and suffix effects. It
is suggested that a sensory memory account together with an attention-biasi
ng strategy by which limited encoding resources are diverted toward the ter
minal list item can better accommodate the data.