Cd. Eggleton et al., Insoluble surfactants on a drop in an extensional flow: a generalization of the stagnated surface limit to deforming interfaces, J FLUID MEC, 385, 1999, pp. 79-99
A drop in an axisymmetric extensional flow is studied using boundary integr
al methods to understand the effects of a monolayer-forming surfactant on a
strongly deforming interface. Surfactants occupy area, so there is an uppe
r bound to the surface concentration that can be adsorbed in a monolayer, G
amma(infinity). The surface tension is a highly nonlinear function of the s
urface concentration Gamma because of this upper bound. As a result, the me
chanical response of the system varies strongly with Gamma for realistic ma
terial parameters. In this work, an insoluble surfactant is considered in t
he limit where the drop and external fluid viscosities are equal.
For Gamma much less than Gamma(infinity), surface convection sweeps surfact
ant toward the drop poles. When surface diffusion is negligible, once the s
table drop shapes are attained, the interface can be divided into stagnant
caps near the drop poles, where Gamma is non-zero, and tangentially mobile
regions near the drop equator, where the surface concentration is zero. Thi
s result is general for any axisymmetric fluid particle. For Gamma near Gam
ma(infinity), the stresses resisting accumulation are large in order to pre
vent the local concentration from reaching the upper bound, As a result, th
e surface is highly stressed tangentially while Gamma departs only slightly
from a uniform distribution. For this case, Gamma is never zero, so the ta
ngential surface velocity is zero for the steady drop shape.
This observation that Gamma dilutes nearly uniformly for high surface conce
ntrations is used to derive a simplified form for the surface mass balance
that applies in the limit of high surface concentration. The balance requir
es that the tangential flux should balance the local dilatation in order th
at the surface concentration profile will remain spatially uniform. Through
out the drop evolution, this equation yields results in agreement with the
full solution for moderate deformations, and underscores the dominant mecha
nism at high deformation. The simplified balance reduces to the stagnant in
terface condition at steady state.
Drop deformations vary non-monotonically with concentration; for Gamma much
less than Gamma(infinity), the reduction of the surface tension near the p
oles leads to higher deformations than the clean interface case. For Gamma
near Gamma(infinity), however, Gamma dilutes nearly uniformly, resulting in
higher mean surface tensions and smaller deformations. The drop contributi
on to the volume averaged stress tensor is also calculated and shown to var
y non-monotonically with surface concentration.