Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies in end-stage renal disease

Citation
F. Fabrizi et al., Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies in end-stage renal disease, J NEPHROL, 12(2), 1999, pp. 89-94
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
ISSN journal
11218428 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
89 - 94
Database
ISI
SICI code
1121-8428(199903/04)12:2<89:A(AIER>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Data are few and conflicting about the prevalence and risk factors for anti phospholipid (aPL) antibodies in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We studied the prevalence, risk factors and clinical manifestations of lupus anticoag ulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) among ESRD patients (chroni c hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplant recipients) and blood do nors. LA was assessed in a large cohort (n=180) of patients by the activate d partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), dilute Russel's viper venom test (dRV VT) and lupus anticoagulant-sensitive aPTT reagent (PTT-LA). IgM- and IgG-a CL were measured by a solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 111 patients (61.5%). The prevalence of aPL was low but, it was higher in ESRD than blood donors (8.8% (16/180) vs. 0%, P=0.005); the frequency of aCL was also higher in ESRD than controls (10.8% (12/111) vs, 0%, P=0.002) , LA was similar in the study and control groups (2.2% (4/180) vs. 0%, NS), Among HD patients and kidney allograft recipients there was no difference in LA (3.9% (4/101)vs. 0% (0/79), NS) and aCL frequency (18.6% (8/43) vs. 5 .9% (4/68), NS), aPL was not associated with sex, age, time on HD, post-tra nsplantation followup, ESRD etiology, thrombotic or hem orrhagic events, or type of HD membrane; however, these findings must be interpreted with caut ion, given the low frequency of aPL. In one HD patient LA activity was asso ciated with multiple thrombosis of the access graft and native veins. In su mmary, the prevalence of aPL in ESRD is low but nevertheless higher than co ntrols; LA does not appear to be related to membrane bio-incompatibility an d it may be linked to vascular thrombosis; the lack of concordance between LA and aCL was apparent. Further studies are needed to clarify the issue of aPL in ESRD. LA testing should be incorporated into the diagnostic evaluat ion of recurrent thrombotic episodes in patients on HD.