Natural copepods are superior to enriched Artemia nauplii as feed for halibut larvae (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) in terms of survival, pigmentation and retinal morphology: Relation to dietary essential fatty acids
Rj. Shields et al., Natural copepods are superior to enriched Artemia nauplii as feed for halibut larvae (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) in terms of survival, pigmentation and retinal morphology: Relation to dietary essential fatty acids, J NUTR, 129(6), 1999, pp. 1186-1194
Replicate groups of halibut larvae were fed to d 71 post-first feeding (PFF
) either the marine copepod, Eurytemora velox, or Artemia nauplii doubly en
riched with the marine chromist or golden algae, Schizochytrium sp., (Algam
ac 2000) and a commercial oil emulsion (SuperSelco). The fatty acid composi
tions of eyes, brains and livers from larvae fed the two diets were measure
d, and indices of growth, eye migration and skin pigmentation were recorded
along with histological examinations of eye and liver. The docosahexaenoic
acid [22:6(n-3); DHA]/eicosapentaenoic acid [20:5(n-3); EPA] ratios in Art
emia nauplii enriched with the SuperSelco and Algamac 2000 were 0.4 and 1.0
, respectively, The E. velox copepods were divided into two size ranges (12
5-250 and 250-400 mu m) with the smaller size range containing the highest
level of (n-3) highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA). The DHA/EPA ratios fo
r the two size ranges of copepods were 2.0 and 0.9, respectively, The total
lipids of eyes, brains and livers of larvae fed copepods had higher levels
of DHA and lower levels of EPA than those of larvae fed enriched Artemia.
The percentage of survival of the halibut larvae was significantly higher w
hen copepods rather than enriched Artemia nauplii were fed, but larval spec
ific growth rates did not differ. The indices of eye migration were high an
d not significantly different in larvae fed the two diets, but the percenta
ge of larvae undergoing successful metamorphosis (complete eye migration an
d dorsal pigmentation) was higher in larvae fed copepods (40%) than in larv
ae fed enriched Artemia (4%). The rod/cone ratios in histological sections
of the retina were 2.5 +/- 0.7 in larvae fed copepods and 1.3 +/- 0.6 in la
rvae fed enriched Artemia (P < 0.01), Histological examination of the liver
s and intestines of the larvae were consistent with better assimilation of
lipid from copepods than lipid from Artemia nauplii up to 46 d post-first f
eeding. Thus, marine copepods are superior to enriched Artemia as food for
halibut larvae in terms of survival, eye development and pigmentation, and
this superiority can be related to the level of DHA in the feed.