Accounting for source location errors in the bayesian analysis of seismicity and seismic hazard

Citation
O. Diaz et al., Accounting for source location errors in the bayesian analysis of seismicity and seismic hazard, J SEISMOL, 3(2), 1999, pp. 153-166
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY
ISSN journal
13834649 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
153 - 166
Database
ISI
SICI code
1383-4649(199904)3:2<153:AFSLEI>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A method is presented for incorporating the uncertainties associated with h ypocentral locations in the formulation of probabilistic models of the time and space distributions of the activity of potential seismic sources, as w ell as of the resulting seismic hazard functions at sites in their vicinity . For this purpose, a bayesian framework of analysis is adopted, where the probabilistic models considered are assumed to have known forms and uncerta in parameters, the distribution of the latter being the result of an a prio ri assessment and its updating through the incorporation of the direct stat istical information, including the uncertainty associated with the relation s between the actual hypocentral locations and the reported data. This unce rtainty is incorporated in the evaluation of the likelihood function of the parameters to be estimated for a given sample of recorded locations. For t he purpose of illustration, the method proposed is applied to the modelling of the seismic sources near a site close to the southern coast of Mexico. The results of two alternate algorithms for the incorporation of location u ncertainties are compared with those arising from neglecting those uncertai nties. One of them makes use of Monte Carlo simulation, while the other is based on a closed-form analytical integration following the introduction of some simplifying assumptions. For the particular case studied, accounting for location uncertainties gives place to significant changes in the probab ilistic models of the seismic sources. Deviations of the same order of magn itude can be ascribed to differences in the mathematical and/or numerical t ools used in the uncertainty analysis. The resulting variability of the sei smic hazard at the site of interest is less pronounced than that affecting the estimates of activity of individual seismic sources.