A. Lissak et al., Immediate versus delayed treatment of perimenopausal bleeding due to benign causes by balloon thermal ablation, J AM AS G L, 6(2), 1999, pp. 145-150
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS
Study Objective. To compare the effectiveness and safety of thermal balloon
ablation without pretreatment with endometrium-thinning agents compared wi
th delayed ablation with pretreatment for women with perimenopausal menorrh
agia.
Design. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force clas
sification I).
Setting. Hospital-based ambulatory medical center.
Patients. Thirty women age 46 to 51 years with severe enough perimenopausal
menorrhagia to make them candidates for either hysterectomy or endometrial
ablation. Two patients with submucosal myomas and six who had undergone ce
sarean section were included. interventions. Thirteen patients were randoml
y assigned to be treated within 30 days and received a single intramuscular
administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analog; 17 women w
ere allocated to be treated within 3 days of enrollment without uterine pre
paration. A thermal balloon was inserted transcervically under general anes
thesia, and after inflation in the endometrial cavity with 5% dextrose in w
ater, was heated to 87 degrees C for 8 minutes.
Measurements and Main Results. Immediate and long-term major and minor comp
lications and success rates were analyzed. Bleeding patterns and mean durat
ion of menstrual flow were compared between groups at 6-month follow-up. No
major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in either gro
up, including the women who had recently undergone hysteroscopic myomectomy
or had a history of cesarean section. Minor side effects were similar in b
oth groups, and did not exceed 5%. Overall, at 6-month follow-up, 7 women w
ere amenorrheic, 20 hypomenorrheic, and 3 eumenorrheic. No significant diff
erences were noted between women treated with immediate or delayed ablation
in either the distribution of bleeding patterns or days of flow per cycle
(mean +/- SEM 1.8 +/- 0.42 vs 2.1 +/- 0.75 days, respectively).
Conclusion. This pilot study suggests that prompt treatment of perimenopaus
al menorrhagia with thermal balloon endometrial ablation is as effective an
d sale as deferred therapy combined with GnRH analog as an endometrium-thin
ning agent. In light of our results, the theory that previous cesarean sect
ion and presence of small submucosal myomas constitute relative contraindic
ations for the procedure merits further consideration.