Sa. Vora et al., MANAGEMENT OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS THAT DEVELOP AT THE LUMPECTOMY SITEAFTER BREAST-CONSERVING THERAPY, Radiology, 203(3), 1997, pp. 667-671
PURPOSE: To design a decision tree according to time from irradiation
and site, morphology, and number of microcalcifications for the ration
al treatment of patients with microcalcifications at the lumpectomy si
te after breast-conserving therapy (BCT), to minimize performance of b
iopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a database of 504 women selected to
receive BCT, those developing probably benign microcalcifications wit
hin 3 years of BCT received close follow-up with mammography. Patients
developing fewer than four probably benign microcalcifications more t
han 3 years after treatment were offered mammography or biopsy. If mic
rocalcifications appeared malignant or patients developed four or more
microcalcifications after 3 years, biopsy was performed. RESULTS: Twe
nty-eight patients (29 breasts [5.7%]) developed microcalcifications c
onfined to the lumpectomy site. Fifteen patients (15 breasts) develope
d microcalcifications within 3 years of BCT and were followed up with
mammography. Thirteen patients (14 breasts) developed microcalcificati
ons confined to the lumpectomy site after more than 3 years. Among the
latter group, microcalcifications appeared malignant in four breasts,
and biopsy specimens revealed three recurrences. The remaining 10 bre
asts were followed up with mammography. No patient undergoing mammogra
phic follow-up without biopsy has had clinical evidence of local failu
re throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Follow-up mammography
is an option when benign-appearing microcalcifications develop at the
lumpectomy site depending on time of appearance and number; it is the
primary recommendation when these microcalcifications develop within 3
years after treatment.