Ag. Maier et al., PERITUMORAL TISSUE REACTION AT TRANSRECTAL US AS A POSSIBLE CAUSE OF OVERSTAGING IN RECTAL-CANCER - HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION, Radiology, 203(3), 1997, pp. 785-789
PURPOSE: To assess if peritumoral tissue reaction (PTR) can be differe
ntiated from tumor with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to avert oversta
ging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative TRUS results in 40 consecuti
ve patients with biopsy-proved rectal cancer were compared with histop
athologic reports on the specimens (study 1). To lest the hypothesis t
hat areas more anechoic than the tumor were deemed responsible for inc
orrect staging in study 1, a prospective study was undertaken in anoth
er 40 consecutive patients (study 2). The thickest part of PTR was mea
sured, and results were compared with the histopathologic findings. RE
SULTS: In study 1, 28 (70%) of 40 rectal cancers were staged correctly
with TRUS. PTR was responsible for the misinterpretation in six of se
ven overstaged cases. In study 2, 38 (95%) of 40 cancers were staged c
orrectly, and the presence or absence of PTR was described in 39 cases
(98%). A statistically significant positive correlation was noted bet
ween histopathologic classification of PTR and its thickness measured
with TRUS (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Because of its more anechoic appear
ance, PTR may be differentiated from the tumor by means of TRUS. This
may lead to a statistically significantly higher accuracy of TRUS in t
he staging of rectal cancer due to the avoidance of overstaging.