PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging f
or the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by using anatom
ic and histologic studies of the resected tissue as a standard of refe
rence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen diabetic patients with high cli
nical suspicion of osteomyelitis underwent a total of 15 MR examinatio
ns before surgery. Correlation was made between MR findings and the hi
stologic features of the resected tissue, which included 57 bones. RES
ULTS: Maximum signal intensity on the T2-weighted or short inversion t
ime inversion-recovery images of the bones was due to osteomyelitis (p
rospective sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 71%). Eighteen bones with in
creased signal intensity showed only edema of the marrow. The range of
signal intensity in edema overlapped that in osteomyelitis but was lo
wer. The use of gadopentetate dimeglumine improved delineation of soft
-tissue inflammatory masses, but this contrast material was not useful
in distinguishing osteomyelitis from edema. CONCLUSION: Marrow edema
cannot be reliably distinguished from osteomyelitis with MR imaging. G
adopentetate dimeglumine is of limited use. Some previously published
false-positive reports of osteomyelitis were most likely due to edema
of the marrow. MR imaging is useful in planning surgery of the infecte
d diabetic foot, as it enables reliable distinction between normal and
abnormal areas.