Partitioning of C-14-labeled photosynthate to allelochemicals and primary metabolites in source and sink leaves of aspen: evidence for secondary metabolite turnover
Kw. Kleiner et al., Partitioning of C-14-labeled photosynthate to allelochemicals and primary metabolites in source and sink leaves of aspen: evidence for secondary metabolite turnover, OECOLOGIA, 119(3), 1999, pp. 408-418
Theories on allelochemical concentrations in giants are often based upon th
e relative carbon costs and benefits of multiple metabolic fractions. Tests
of these theories often rely on measuring metabolite concentrations, but f
requently overlook priorities in carbon partitioning. We conducted a pulse-
labeling experiment to follow the partitioning of (CO2)-C-14-labeled photos
ynthate into ten metabolic pools representing growth and maintenance (amino
acids, organic acids, lipids plus pigments, protein, residue), defense (ph
enolic glycosides, methanol:water and acetone-soluble tannins/phenolics). a
nd transport and storage (sugars and starch) in source and importing sink l
eaves of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). The peak period of C-14 incor
poration into sink leaves occurred at 24 h. Within 48 h of labeling, the sp
ecific radioactivity (dpm/mg dry leaf weight) of phenolic glycosides declin
ed by over one-third in source and sink leaves. In addition, the specific r
adioactivity in the tannin phenolic fraction decreased by 53% and 28% in so
urce and sink leaves, respectively. On a percent recovery basis. sink leave
s partitioned 1.7 times as much labeled photosynthate into phenolic glycosi
des as source leaves at peak C-14 incorporation, In contrast, source leaves
partitioned 1.8 times as much C-14-labeled photosynthate into tannins/phen
olics as importing sink leaves. At the end of the 7-day chase period, sink
leaves retained 18%, 52%, and 30% of imported C-14 photosynthate, and label
ed source leaves retained 15%, 66%, and 19% of in situ photosynthate in met
abolic fractions representing transport and storage, growth and maintenance
, and defense, respectively. Analyses of the phenolic fractions showed that
total phenolics were twice as great and condensed tannins were 1.7 times g
reater in sink than in source leaves. The concentration of total phenolics
and condensed tannins did not change in source and sink leaves during the 7
-day chase period.