Poor housing conditions, harsh training sessions and uncontrollable or
unpredictable social environments are examples of the situations that
may lead to reduced welfare status in dogs. Individuals that suffer f
rom poor welfare presumably experience stress and may consequently exh
ibit stress responses. In order to evaluate stress responses as potent
ial indicators of poor welfare in dogs, we review studies dealing with
dogs subjected to stressors. The reported stress responses are catego
rized as being behavioural, physiological or immunological, and demons
trate the various ways stress is manifested in the dog. Stressors such
as noise, immobilization, training, novelty, transport or restricted
housing conditions have been reported to elicit responses in behaviour
al, cardiovascular, endocrine, renal, gastro-intestinal, and haematolo
gical parameters. These and other parameters that change during stress
may thus be indicative of poor welfare. However, several sources of m
isinterpretation have to be considered before stress responses may be
used as valid indicators of welfare. Although analogous to the human s
ituation, especially chronic stress may impair welfare, most studies d
eal with acute stress and do not address chronic stress and related ph
enomena. Adaptation may counteract the initial stress response and ren
der parameters of acute stress useless for assessing chronic stress. A
daptations to stress are thus in themselves indicative of reduced welf
are. Such adaptations may be discovered by challenging a stress respon
sive system. Additional studies are recommended to investigate acute s
tress parameters as possible indicators of chronic stress. Differences
in stressor properties and in individual characteristics of dogs intr
oduce variability in stress responses. Such variability will complicat
e a valid interpretation of stress responses with regard to welfare. O
btaining and applying fundamental knowledge of stress responses in dog
s and measuring more than one stress parameter are proposed to minimiz
e the risk of misinterpreting measurements of stress. (C) 1997 Elsevie
r Science B.V.