Drought adaptation of field grown wheat in relation to soil physical conditions

Citation
M. Ali et al., Drought adaptation of field grown wheat in relation to soil physical conditions, PLANT SOIL, 208(1), 1999, pp. 149-159
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
PLANT AND SOIL
ISSN journal
0032079X → ACNP
Volume
208
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
149 - 159
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-079X(1999)208:1<149:DAOFGW>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
In order to investigate the effects of soil texture on possible non-hydraul ic signals under field conditions, spring wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L . cv. Cadensa) grown in sand and loam soils and with a well developed root system were exposed to slow soil drying in the late vegetative stage of gro wth. Soil water potential and content were measured daily at different dept hs and plant responses were measured in flag leaves. When the average soil water potential in the top soil layers (0-25 cm depth in sand and 0-45 cm d epth in loam) dropped to -60 or -70 kPa and the lower soil layers were stil l at field capacity, morning xylem [ABA] (0.03-0.04 vs. 0.06-0.08 mmol m(-3 )) and midday leaf ABA concentration increased (250-300 vs. 400-450 ng/g DW ) and leaf conductance decreased relatively to well-watered (control) plant s (0.75-0.88 vs. 0.64-0.70 mol m(-2) s(-1)). These responses took place bef ore any decrease in leaf water potential occurred as compared with control plants, indicating that they were triggered by root-borne signals due to re duced root water status in the top soil layers. At this stage the soil wate r content was as low as 6% by volume, the fraction of roots in 'wet' soil w as 0.12 and relative available soil water was 45% in sand and still high 20 %, 0.48 and 70%, respectively, in loam of the whole soil profile indicating that roots were responding to soil water availability and not soil water c ontent at a certain evaporative demand. In addition, similar responses occu rred at high and low evaporative demands (3.4-5.2 vs. 0.6-4.0 mm/day of pot ential evapotranspiration).