This content analysis of national evening television news examines how publ
ic opinion was covered during the 1996 presidential general election campai
gn using a broader definition of public opinion than simply poll results. I
t reveals that the heavy emphasis on the "horse race" found in poll reporti
ng is not shared in the extensive "people-on-the-street" reporting. Instead
, people-on-the-street coverage comes closer than pall reporting to providi
ng a public sphere where a wide range of people voice varied attitudes abou
t matters of public importance. The extent to which these reported opinions
reflect poll results is also examined.