Two connectionist frameworks, GRAIN (J. L. McClelland, 1993) and brain-stat
e-in-a-box (J. A. Anderson, 1991), and R. Ratcliffs (1978) diffusion model
were evaluated using data from a signal detection task. Dependent variables
included response probabilities, reaction times for correct and error resp
onses, and shapes of reaction-time distributions. The diffusion model accou
nted for all aspects of the data, including error reaction times that had p
reviously been a problem for all response-time models. The connectionist mo
dels accounted for many aspects of the data adequately, but each failed to
a greater or lesser degree in important ways except for one model that was
similar to the diffusion model. The findings advance the development of the
diffusion model and show that the long tradition of reaction-time research
and theory is a fertile domain for development and testing of connectionis
t assumptions about how decisions are generated over time.