Af. Goddard et al., Randomized controlled comparison of nitroimidazoles for the eradication ofHelicobacter pylori and relief of ulcer-associated and non-ulcer dyspepsia., ALIM PHARM, 13(5), 1999, pp. 637-642
Background: A combination of omeprazole, clarithromycin and either metronid
azole or tinidazole is commonly used for Helicobacter pylori eradication, M
etronidazole is considerably cheaper than tinidazole but the two have not p
reviously been compared in a randomized trial.
Methods: One hundred and twenty dyspeptic H. pylori-positive patients with
endoscopically defined peptic ulcer [DU (n = 65), GU (n = 12)] or non-ulcer
dyspepsia (NUD, n = 43) were randomized to receive a 1-week course of twic
e daily omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and either metronidazole 40
0 mg (OCM) or tinidazole 500 mg (OCT) in a double-blind fashion, Eradicatio
n of H. pylori, safety and side-effects of treatment, dyspeptic symptom sco
re and consumption of antisecretory drugs were assessed at 6 weeks and 1 ye
ar after treatment.
Results: H, pylori eradication was successfully achieved in 57/60 (95%, ITT
analysis) of patients receiving OCT and 58/60 (97%, ITT analysis) receivin
g OCM. Both regimens had similar side-effect profiles, which accounted for
only one patient withdrawal. All patients remained uninfected (as assessed
by C-14-urea breath test) at 1-year follow-up, but major symptom improvemen
ts and decreased antisecretory drug use were only seen in patients with DU
(P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Treatment with OCM is as effective as the more expensive OCT a
t eradicating H, pylori. H. pylori eradication results in long-term relief
of dyspeptic symptoms and reduced antisecretory consumption only in patient
s with DU, and not in those with NUD.