Jp. Ottervanger et al., Limitation of myocardial infarct size after primary angioplasty: Is a higher potency the only mechanism?, AM HEART J, 137(6), 1999, pp. 1169-1172
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background several studies demonstrate a better outcome after primary angio
plasty compared with thrombolysis, The mechanism is assumed to be a higher
rate of open infarct-related vessels.
Methods and Results We conducted a randomized trial of primary coronary ang
ioplasty compared with thrombolysis. A total of 401 patients with acute myo
cardial infarction were randomly assigned to either primary angioplasty or
thrombolytic therapy. Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction was p
erformed before hospital discharge. Infarct size was estimated by measureme
nt of serial lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH Q72). separate analyses we
re performed in patients with an open infarct-related vessel, either after
thrombolysis or angioplasty. Baseline characteristics were comparable betwe
en the 2 treatment groups. Of the 197 patients treated with angioplasty, 17
6 (89%) had an open infarct-related vessel compared with 126 (62%) of the 2
04 patients treated with thrombolysis (P < .001). In patients with an open
infarct-related vessel, those treated with primary angioplasty had a lower
enzyme release compared with those treated with thrombolysis: LDH Q72 949 (
748) and 1200 (1117), respectively (P < .05). Compared with angioplasty, pa
tients treated with thrombolysis had a lower left ventricular ejection frac
tion. In the subgroup of patients with an open infarct-related vessel, afte
r thrombolysis or angioplasty, patients treated with thrombolysis still had
a lower ejection fraction (47% vs 50%, P < .05). Multivariate analysis, ad
justing for differences in several clinical variables, did not change these
results. Patients with an open infarct-related vessel and thrombolysis had
a higher risk of an ejection fraction <40% compared with patients treated
with primary angioplasty (relative risk 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to
2.7).
Conclusions Despite successful thrombolysis, with sustained potency of the
infarct-related vessel, primary angioplasty remains superior to thrombolyti
c therapy with regard to left ventricular function and enzymatic infarct si
ze. This may be caused by adverse effects of fibrinolytics on infarcted myo
cardium.