Credentialing, diversity, and professional recognition - Foundations for an Australian infection control career path

Background: There are no regulatory, legislative, or professional criteria stipulating minimum qualifications or experience that a health care worker must meet to be capable of coordinating an Australian infection control (IC ) program. Measurement of IC competence is important to protect the public and for the ongoing credibility and growth of the profession. Method: Our study group was all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association in 1996. The survey examined p erceived level of proficiency, level of education, and experience in health care and infection control. Almost three quarters (65%) of the members res ponded, and almost all (85%) of these respondents fulfilled the inclusion c riterion of coordinating an IC program. Results: Experience in IC ranged from less than 2 years (33.6%) to more tha n 20 years (10.0%). The majority (65.0%) of infection control professionals (ICPs) had between 8 years and 12 years IC experience. The respective prop ortions of respondents' self-ranked levels of proficiency on a 5-point scal e were novice (3.6%), advanced beginner (21.2%), competent (33.8%), profici ent (34.7%), and expert (6.8%). Almost half (47%) of the novices agreed tha t a registered nursing (RN) qualification was required, whereas a majority (41%) of advanced beginners considered both an RN and a basic IC course (BA SIC) were required. Competent ICPs agreed less often than the other levels about their requirements. However, 27% of competents identified a BASIC and an undergraduate degree (UG) as the minimum requirements for a competent I CP. Proficient ICPs agreed that they required an RN, UG, BASIC, and a postb asic course in IC. Nearly all experts (80.0%) agreed that they required an RN, UG, BASIC, postbasic course, and a course in hospital epidemiology (EP) . Two thirds of experts expected a master's degree as a requirement. Conclusion: The Australian IC profession is in an exciting period of develo pment: however, the variation in ICD perception of the most appropriate qua lifications and experience threatens the credibility and viability of the p rofession. This variation indicates the need for a clear-cut pathway that i ncludes a system of credentialing, recognition of expertise, adoption of di vergent roles, and improved networking. This pathway will lead to an increa singly credible and viable IC profession in Australia. Developing IC commun ities globally can benefit from the Australian experience.