The influence of drinker allocation and group size on the drinking behaviour, welfare and production of growing pigs

Current Welfare Code recommendations suggest one nipple drinker per 10 pigs , while farmers have often used a ratio of one per 20 animals. This stateme nt is based on information from pig farmers and advisors in the United King dom. Neither approach is based on empirical investigation. The use of large r group sizes in commercial herds raises further questions, since the relat ionship between group size and the appropriate number of drinking points ca nnot be assumed to be linear. The aim was to assess the two conflicting dri nker allocations for their effect on welfare, as measured by drinking behav iour, social behaviour and performance, and any effect of group size on the se. A total of 640 Large White x Landrace growing pigs were assigned to fou r treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement (60 pigs, three drinkers; 20 pigs, one drinker; 60 pigs, six drinkers and 20 pigs, ti oo drinkers). Drin ker provision had no significant effect on water use (5.10, 3.88, 4.99 and 3.45 s.e. 0.231 l per pig per day respectively) but in a larger group more water teas used in less drinking time (P < 0.001). The diurnal pattern of w ater use was similar for each treatment. More aggression occurred at the dr inker ill large groups with a poorer drinker allocation (11.0 v. 3.8% of dr inking bouts terminated by aggression for 60 pigs with three drinkers and m ean all other treatments respectively, P < 0.05). Overt aggression (2.22, 2 .27, 1.76 and 2.07 (s.e. 0.284) aggressive acts per pig per h, respectively ) and lesion score counts of a sample of pigs from each pen suggested no di fference between treatments. Providing one drinker per 20 animals, even in a large group, did not affect drinking behaviour, social behaviour or produ ction. These findings should not be extrapolated to situations of different ambient temperature, water flow rate or feeding strategy.