Reflective properties of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus), the fabric of their housing and the characteristics of the light environment in environmentally controlled poultry houses

Citation
Nb. Prescott et Cm. Wathes, Reflective properties of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus), the fabric of their housing and the characteristics of the light environment in environmentally controlled poultry houses, BR POULT SC, 40(2), 1999, pp. 185-193
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00071668 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
185 - 193
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1668(199905)40:2<185:RPODF(>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
1. The light intensity and spectral power distribution in 3 broiler and 6 l ayer houses were sampled and converted to a measure which takes account of the domestic fowl's spectral sensitivity (termed lux corrected). Light inte nsity was highly variable around the layer houses (mean 33.2, s.d. 37.7 lux (corrected)) and to a lesser extent in the broiler houses (mean 5.2, s.d. 2.2 lux (corrected)). The mean intensities were also very much lower than o n a sunny,June day at midday at Silsoe (42,937 lux (corrected)) and of diff erent power distributions. 2. The reflectivity of the plumage of 15 traditional breeds of domestic fow l was surveyed. Most feathers showed a characteristic pattern of reflectivi ty, increasing either side of a wavelength of lambda=400 nm. In 13 breeds t he tail and wing feathers were darker than the breast and back feathers. Re flectivity at lambda=700 nm was a good predictor of reflectivity at lambda= 320 nm. Food, bedding, wood and skin all had similar reflectivities to feat hers. Metal, plastic and rubber all had more constant reflectivities across the spectrum. 3. The reflectivities of the fresh, feathered carcases of 3 male broilers ( Cobb) and 3 layer hens (ISA Brown) were measured. There were small changes in hue and saturation within and between individual carcases, even for the apparently white broiler chickens. 4. Photographs were taken, with and without a UVA-only pass filter, of a br oiler cock (Cobb), layer hen (ISA Brown) and cock jungle fowl. No additiona l patternation was evident in the UVA-only photographs and the jungle fowl lost most of its ornamentation. The texture of bare skin was enhanced in th e UVA-only photographs. 5. The implications of these results for poultry behaviour are discussed.