Multicenter clinical trials conducted in the United States and Europe to co
mpare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine with tacrolimus (FK506) have
demonstrated comparable long-term patient survival and graft survival in li
ver and renal transplant recipients. Importantly, treatment with tacrolimus
was associated with reductions in the incidence and severity of acute reje
ction episodes. However, tacrolimus-based therapy was also associated with
increased toxicities in comparison to conventional cyclosporine-based thera
py. It is becoming increasingly accepted that earlier trials may have emplo
yed high or supratherapeutic doses of tacrolimus and may have been unbalanc
ed with respect to study design. In addition, these pivotal comparative tri
als were performed with the original formulation of cyclosporine, and not t
he cyclosporine microemulsion preparation. This critical review of the lite
rature focuses on the United States and European tacrolimus multicenter cli
nical trials and examines the efficacy and safety of the two primary immuno
suppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, obtained in these and other stud
ies. The preliminary findings of ongoing studies comparing the efficacy and
safety of the improved formulation, cyclosporine microemulsion, with tacro
limus are also discussed. The overall efficacy of the two agents appears to
be similar. The safety profile shows differing toxicities of the two medic
ations. The availability of these two immunosuppressants allows the clinici
an improved options when choosing an immunosuppressive regimen in solid org
an transplantation.