Eh. Birnbaum et al., Selection criteria for treatment of rectal cancer with combined external and endocavitary radiation, DIS COL REC, 42(6), 1999, pp. 727-733
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of recurr
ence of rectal tumors treated with combined external and endocavitary radia
tion. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with rectal cancer were evaluated clini
cally and with transrectal ultrasound before combined external and endocavi
tary radiation. Ideal lesions were moderately differentiated, mobile, not u
lcerated, <3 cm in diameter, and <12 cm from the anal verge. External radia
tion (4,500 cGy) was given during five weeks followed by endocavitary radia
tion (3,000 cGp x 2). Median followup was 31 (range, 7-93) months. RESULTS:
Pretreatment transrectal ultrasound stages were uT1 (6 patients), uT2(27 p
atients), and uT3 (39 patients). Clinical evaluation identified 26 ideal an
d 46 nonideal tumors. Overall recurrence was 36 percent; mean time to recur
rence was 12 months. Ideal lesions recurred less than nonideal (15 vs. 48 p
ercent; P = 0.01). Mobile lesions recurred less than tethered lesions (26 v
s. 52 percent; P = 0.048). Transrectal ultrasound stage was predictive of r
ecurrence (0 percent uT1, 22 percent uT2, and 51 percent uT3; P = 0.015). S
urgery was possible in 14 of 17 patients with pelvic recurrence only; 11 pa
tients (65 percent) had curative surgery. Distant metastases occurred in ni
ne patients; all had pelvic recurrences, and six died of disease. CONCLUSIO
N: Patients with uT3 or nonideal rectal cancers should not be offered combi
ned external and endocavitary radiation for cure. Transrectal ultrasound st
age is the only independent predictor of recurrence.