Mjgm. Rongen et al., Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty aftermiles resection - Feasible, but with a high morbidity, DIS COL REC, 42(6), 1999, pp. 776-780
PURPOSE: Until recently, patients who underwent abdominoperineal resections
had to cope with a colostomy for the rest of their lives. For some of thes
e patients this colostomy was a terrible burden, physically and mentally. P
ublications about abdominoperineal pull-through and double dynamic gracilop
lasty immediately after a Miles resection showed good results. The purpose
of this study was to investigate the procedure as a secondary approach afte
r abdominoperineal resections. METHODS: In this study seven patients were e
valuated. All had had an abdominoperineal resection and proved to have unbe
arable problems with their stoma. All had a secondary pull-through and doub
le dynamic graciloplasty, a mean of 8.5 (range, 1.1-34.8) years after the M
ites resection. RESULTS: In five patients continence was regained; two were
reversed to colostomy because of several complications. Patients who had a
successful outcome also suffered from numerous complications, with a total
mean hospital stay of 73.8 (range, 27-167) days, a mean of 3.1 (range, 1-6
) additional operations, and 1.8 (range, 0-4) readmissions. CONCLUSION: Sec
ondary anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection is a feasi
ble option, but with a high morbidity. Because of this the procedure was st
opped at the beginning of 1997.