Holism, nonlinear dynamics, sensitive dependence on initial conditions, and
self-organization are examined in an effort to determine whether these con
cepts have applicability to research and theory on crime, criminals, and th
e criminal justice system It is concluded that these concepts, all part of
a growing science of chaos, show promise of clarifying conflicting empirica
l findings and resolving important theoretical issues within the general fi
eld of criminology. The topics covered in this article include empiricism a
nd the problem of prediction, the reconciliation of polar opposites, reaffi
rming choice, and learning and socialization. A case example is used to ill
ustrate how a chaotic interpretation of individual criminal behavior and ch
ange differs from the traditional positivist, classical, and rehabilitative
perspectives.