Fundamental understanding in rolling ball tack of tackified block copolymer adhesives

Authors
Citation
Mf. Tse, Fundamental understanding in rolling ball tack of tackified block copolymer adhesives, J ADHESION, 70(1-2), 1999, pp. 95-118
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADHESION
ISSN journal
00218464 → ACNP
Volume
70
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
95 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8464(1999)70:1-2<95:FUIRBT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball rack is a v ery common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. Thi s work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolli ng ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer (SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bu lk properties of the adhesive. Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Pa rt of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to v ary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is ob served that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecu lar weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorpo ration of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent lends to p roduce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, a nd surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisopren e, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation. Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an e quation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball rack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these su ggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.