Slowing the titration rate of tramadol HCl reduces the incidence of discontinuation due to nausea and or vomiting: a double-blind randomized trial

Citation
D. Petrone et al., Slowing the titration rate of tramadol HCl reduces the incidence of discontinuation due to nausea and or vomiting: a double-blind randomized trial, J CLIN PH T, 24(2), 1999, pp. 115-123
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
02694727 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
115 - 123
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-4727(199904)24:2<115:STTROT>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background: Ultram(R) [tramadol hydrochloride (HCl)] is a centrally acting analgesic that is widely prescribed for the treatment of moderate to modera tely severe chronic pain. Although tramadol is generally well tolerated, so me patients discontinue use early in the course of treatment because of nau sea and vomiting. Objective: To investigate the effect of three initial titration rates of tr amadol HCl on the incidence of discontinuation due to nausea and/or vomitin g in patients who previously did not tolerate tramadol HCl. Method: A multicentre, outpatient, randomized double-blind study was conduc ted, comprised of two phases: a 14-day open-label run-in phase and a 28-day double-blind phase. In the run-in phase the dose of tramadol was titrated over 4 days to the target of 200 mg/day. Patients who discontinued tramadol HCl due to nausea and/or vomiting in the open-label phase were eligible to enter the 28-day double-blind phase after a 10-day wash-out. Patients were randomized to one of three groups using a 10-, 16- or a 13-day titration s chedule in order to achieve a target dosage of either 200 mg/day (10- and 1 6-day titration groups) or 150 mg/day (13-day titration group). The number of discontinuations due to nausea and/or vomiting in each group were compar ed. Results: Significantly fewer patients (22%) discontinued because of nausea and/or vomiting in the 13- and 16-day titration groups compared to the 10-d ay group (P = 0.008 and P = 0.006, respectively). The time to discontinuati on was also significantly delayed in the 13- and 16-day groups compared to the 10-day group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.007, respectively). The outcome of th e 13-day titration to 150 mg/day was essentially the same as that of the 16 -day titration to 200 mg/day, suggesting that this is a true rate effect ra ther than being dose related. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a slower titration rate of tramado l HCl improves tolerability in patients who previously discontinued therapy due to nausea and/or vomiting. This study also demonstrates that the rate of titration of tramadol HCl rather than the target dose is the major deter minant of tolerability.