Neuropsychological impairments, vocational outcomes, and financial costs for individuals with traumatic brain injury receiving state vocational rehabilitation services

Citation
B. Johnstone et al., Neuropsychological impairments, vocational outcomes, and financial costs for individuals with traumatic brain injury receiving state vocational rehabilitation services, J HEAD TR R, 14(3), 1999, pp. 220-232
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
08859701 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
220 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-9701(199906)14:3<220:NIVOAF>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relationship among neuropsychological variables , vocational outcomes, and vocational costs for Missouri Division of Vocati onal Rehabilitation (MO-DVR) clients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Des ign: Clients referred for neuropsychological evaluations were followed unti l DVR case closure. Subjects were grouped according to the following DVR st atus at case closure: Successfully Employed, Services Interrupted, and No S ervices Provided. Spearman correlations with Bonferroni corrections were ca lculated to determine relationships among variables, and Kruskal-Wallis non parametric one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to evaluate differences in DVR group status in terms of neuropsychological variables a nd DVR costs. Setting: All evaluations were completed through a Midwestern university neuropsychology laboratory. Patients: 110 consecutively referred DVR clients with nonacute TBI referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Main outcome measures: Absolute level (ie, raw/standard scores) of neuropsy chological functioning and relative degree of decline in: intelligence (WAI S-R), memory (WMS-R General and Delayed Memory Indices), attention (WMS-R A ttention Index), speed of processing (Trails A), and cognitive flexibility (Trails B); DVR costs at closure. Results: 1) Surprisingly, the Successfull y Employed group had significantly greater neuropsychological impairments; 2) Greater decline in delayed memory was associated with higher DVR costs ( r = -0.30, P < .05); and 3) More indices of relative decline were significa ntly correlated with vocational outcomes (5/6) than were indices of absolut e functioning (3/6). Conclusions: DVR is effective in providing services to individuals with the most significant neuropsychological deficits; it is i mportant to consider both absolute level of functioning and relative declin e in functioning when evaluating TBI.