Gf. Hoffmann et J. Zschocke, Glutaric aciduria type I: From clinical, biochemical and molecular diversity to successful therapy, J INH MET D, 22(4), 1999, pp. 381-391
The biochemical hallmark of glutaric aciduria type I (GA I) due to glutaryl
-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency is the accumulation of glutaric acid, and to
a lesser degree of 3-hydroxyglutaric and glutaconic acids. Abnormal metabol
ites vary from gross organic aciduria to only slightly or intermittently el
evated or even normal excretion of glutaric acid, making the diagnosis some
times difficult. Close to 100 pathogenic mutations have been identified in
the gene encoding glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase. Specific mutations correlate
with low or no excretion of glutaric acid, but there appears to be no corre
lation between genotype and clinical phenotype.
GA I causes unique age- and location-specific neuropathological sequelae. S
tarting in the second half of gestation, maturation of the frontal and temp
oral cortex is hindered, leading to the characteristic appearance of fronto
temporal atrophy. Between 6 and 18 months of age, relatively mild neurologi
cal symptoms may become exacerbated by fever or a catabolic state in the co
urse of common infections or routine immunizations, by fasts required for s
urgery, or by minor head injuries. Putamen and caudate are destroyed, resul
ting in a permanent movement disorder that is similar to cerebral palsy and
ranges from extreme hypotonia to choreoathetosis to rigidity with spastici
ty. Recently, the underlying pathophysiology could be delineated to an envi
ronmentally triggered age- and location-specific overstimulation of the NMD
A 2B receptor subtype.
Current therapy prevents brain degeneration in more than 90% of affected in
fants who are treated prospectively. Without treatment, more than 90% of af
fected children will develop severe neurological disabilities. Recognition
of this disorder before the brain has been injured is essential to treatmen
t. GA I may be recognized in routine neonatal screening performed with tand
em mass spectrometry by an elevation of glutarylcarnitine. Where this is no
t done, timely diagnosis depends on the recognition of relatively nonspecif
ic physical findings such as hypotonia, irritability, macrocephaly, on the
detection of suggestive abnormalities in neuroimaging and on quantitative u
rinary organic acid analysis by gas chromatography - mass spectrometry.