In this article I analyze the ways in which a national response to an
international controversy-the naming of the ''Former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia''-is mediated by local-level kinship practices. While th
e Greek government insists that it has historical claims to this name,
much oi the press in the United States and Europe depicts Greece as d
isplaying ''hysteria over history'' with respect to this issue. Both o
f these discourses mask the significance of the issue of the name ''Ma
cedonia'' for ordinary Greeks, as interpreted through their ideologies
and practices concerned with giving baptismal names and with inherita
nce and continuity. These provide the unstated assumptions through whi
ch a national ideology of historical continuity is filtered and reform
ulated. This case study suggests how anthropologists can make a unique
contribution to current studies of nationalism ''from the bottom up''
.