The utility of traditional validity scales in detecting random responding a
nd overreporting on the MMPI-A and in discriminating between these two resp
onse sets was investigated in a sample of 89 clinical and nonclinical adole
scents aged 14 to 17 years. The overreporting group consisted of 24 nonclin
ical adolescents instructed to complete the MMPI-A as if they were trying t
o create an impression of psychological disturbance. The random group inclu
ded 20 nonclinical adolescents instructed to complete the MMPI-A answer she
et without access to the test booklet. Clinical (n = 20) and nonclinical (n
= 25) standard groups completed the MMPI-A under the standard instructions
. Results showed that validity scales designed to detect random responding
and overreporting on the MMPI-A were quite effective in doing so. Significa
nt differences between groups and high classification rates were noted. In
addition, the VRINscale was found to be sensitive only to random responding
, whereas Scale Fwas sensitive to both random responding and overreporting.
Scale L also was found to be sensitive to random responding, and support f
or the utility of the F-K index in identifying overreported adolescent prof
iles was obtained.