The use of cryopreserved in vitro produced bovine embryos as nuclear transf
er donors was assessed. Day 4 or 5 morulae were vitrified and warmed using
the open pulled straw method and used as donors for nuclear transfer. Altho
ugh the proportion of morulae and blastocysts that developed from nuclear t
ransfer embryos derived from day 5 vitrified embryos did not differ from th
at derived from fresh embryos (16.7 and 24.3%, respectively), development t
o blastocysts was reduced when vitrified donor cells were used (8.3 and 19.
1%, respectively). Likewise, development to morulae and blastocysts was not
different between nuclear transfer embryos derived from day 4 vitrified em
bryos allowed to recover for 24 h, and day 5 vitrified embryos allowed to r
ecover for 1-2 h (27.7 and 15.6%, respectively), but the development to bla
stocysts was reduced when day 5 vitrified donor cells were used (23.2 and 1
0.0%, respectively). However, in nuclear transfer embryos derived from eith
er day 4 vitrified or day 5 fresh donors, no differences were observed in d
evelopment rates to morulae and blastocysts (34.3 and 36.3%, respectively)
or to blastocysts alone (20.2 and 18.1%, respectively). Nor were there diff
erences in the development rates of fresh or day 4 or day 5 vitrified in vi
tro produced (non-nuclear transfer) embryos (47.9, 51.0 and 35.5% developin
g to blastocysts at day 7, respectively). In vitro produced embryos and nuc
lear transfer embryos derived from day 4 vitrified or day 5 fresh donors we
re transferred to recipients at morula or blastocyst stage at day 6 or 7. T
he pregnancy rates were similar in both groups of nuclear transfer embryos,
but higher in the control group consisting of in vitro produced embryos (4
7, 42 and 67%, respectively). In conclusion, if vitrified donor embryos are
allowed to recover for 24 h after warming, their use in nuclear transfer r
esults in similar efficiencies to those achieved with fresh embryos.