Elevated soil arsenic levels at a former crude oil storage facility-assessment, remediation, and possible sources

Citation
De. Wellman et al., Elevated soil arsenic levels at a former crude oil storage facility-assessment, remediation, and possible sources, J SOIL CONT, 8(3), 1999, pp. 329-341
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SOIL CONTAMINATION
ISSN journal
10588337 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
329 - 341
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-8337(199905)8:3<329:ESALAA>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Surface and near-surface soil arsenic levels were measured at a former crud e oil storage facility within the greater Los Angeles area of Southern Cali fornia. Arsenic was present in soil within some portions of the site at con centrations defined as being hazardous by both the State of California and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The elevated soil total arsenic concentrations ranged from about 30 to 2300 mg/kg and generally occ urred in, and adjacent to, the former washing and storage tank locations an d along piping runs. In contrast, background concentrations of arsenic in s oil at the site ranged from less than the analytical method detection limit s (0.5 mg/kg) to approximately 8.0 mg/kg. The elevated soil arsenic concent rations are believed to be the result of the use of arsenical corrosion inh ibitors within production wells and possibly the use of arsenical biocides in washing and skimmer tanks. Flow lines from production wells within the o il field to the crude oil storage facility contained crude oil and produced (formation) water. Arsenical corrosion inhibitors placed into the oil wells may have flowed with the crude oil/produced-water streams into the washing and skimmer tanks. Over the course of approximately 55 years of operation, tankage and piping leaks at the facility may have contributed to the eleva ted soil arsenic concentrations encountered at the site. A site-specific cl eanup goal of 22 mg/kg total arsenic was established by the regulatory agen cy with oversight for the site. Remediation of the arsenic-impacted soil wa s accomplished by excavation and on site treatment using a chemical fixatio n process. Confirmatory samples collected after the fixation process was co mpleted verified that the treatment reduced the concentrations of arsenic t hat could by leached from the soil to nonhazardous levels. The treated soil was subsequently transported offsite to an asphalt recycling facility for incorporation into asphalt paving products.