Ka. Emanuel et M. Zivkovic-rothman, Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models, J ATMOS SCI, 56(11), 1999, pp. 1766-1782
Cumulus convection is a key process in controlling the water vapor content
of the atmosphere, which is in turn the largest feedback mechanism for clim
ate change in global climate models. Yet scant attention has been paid to d
esigning convective representations that attempt to handle water vapor with
fidelity, and even less to evaluating their performance. Here the authors
attempt to address this deficiency by designing a representation of cumulus
convection with close attention paid to convective water fluxes and by sub
jecting the scheme to rigorous tests using sounding array data. The authors
maintain that such tests, in which a single-column model is forced by larg
e-scale processes measured by or inferred from the sounding data, must be c
arried out over a period at least as long as the radiative-subsidence times
cale-about 30 days-governing the water vapor adjustment time. The authors a
lso argue that the observed forcing must be preconditioned to guarantee int
egral enthalpy conservation, else errors in the single-column prediction ma
y be falsely attributed to convective schemes.
Optimization of the new scheme's parameters is performed using one month of
data from the intensive flux array operating during the Tropical Ocean Glo
bal Atmosphere Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment, with the aid o
f the adjoint of the linear tangent of the single-column model. Residual ro
ot-mean-square errors, after optimization, are about 15% in relative humidi
ty and 1.8 K in temperature. It is difficult to reject the hypothesis that
the residual errors are due to noise in the forcing. Evaluation of the conv
ective scheme is performed using Global Atmospheric Researh Program Atlanti
c Tropical Experiment data. The performance of the scheme is compared to th
at of a few other schemes used in current climate models. It is also shown
that a vertical resolution better than 50 mb in pressure is necessary for a
ccurate prediction of atmospheric water vapor.