Background and Purpose. Computerized 3-dimensional (3-D) motion measurement
systems are used by those interested in human motion. The purposes of this
study were (1) to determine the limits of accuracy in determining interseg
mental angles during pendular motion at varying speeds and (2) to determine
changes in accuracy introduced by autodigitization and digitization by exp
erienced manual raters. Methods. Angular speed of a T-shaped pendulum was s
ystematically increased by releasing the pendulum from 4 angles (0 degrees
[no movement], 45 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees). Twelve reference a
ngles calculated from markers placed on the pendulum were estimated over 20
frames for 10 trials at each release position. Results. Mean errors across
trials and frames for intersegmental angles reconstructed by a 3-D motion
measurement system were within +/-1 degree across all release positions. An
analysis of variance and a Post hoc Tukey test revealed that the mean erro
r for the autodigitized trials was larger than that for the manually digiti
zed trials. For the autodigitized trials, the static trials (release positi
on =0 degrees) produced less mean error than the trials with movement produ
ced. The ICCs showed a high degree of consistency among all raters, ranging
from .707 to .999. Conclusion and Discussion. Our findings support the con
clusion that under carefully controlled conditions, a 3-D motion measuremen
t system can produce clinically acceptable measurements of accuracy across
a range of angular speeds. Furthermore, acceptable accuracy is possible reg
ardless of the digitization method.