How does the attractiveness of a particular option depend on comparisons dr
awn between it and other alternatives? We observe that in many cases, compa
risons hurt: When the options being compared have both meaningful advantage
s and meaningful disadvantages, comparison between options makes each optio
n less attractive. The effects of comparison are crucial in choice problems
involving grouped options, because the way in which options are grouped in
fluences which comparisons are likely to be made. In particular we propose
that grouping focuses comparison, making within-group comparisons moi-e lik
ely than between-group comparisons. This line of reasoning suggests that gr
ouping should hurt, and we observe that it does: An option is more likely t
o be chosen when alone than when part of a group.