Safety Management Assessment System (SMAS): a process for identifying and evaluating human and organization factors in marine system operations with field test results

Citation
Dd. Hee et al., Safety Management Assessment System (SMAS): a process for identifying and evaluating human and organization factors in marine system operations with field test results, RELIAB ENG, 65(2), 1999, pp. 125-140
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering Management /General
Journal title
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
ISSN journal
09518320 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
125 - 140
Database
ISI
SICI code
0951-8320(199908)65:2<125:SMAS(A>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Eighty percent or more of major marine accidents are caused or influenced b y humans and organizations. Research has identified characteristics of high reliability organizations (HRO), organizations which have had few accident s while involved in operations where failure would result in severe consequ ences. These characteristics have important effects on the safety of marine systems. Assessing systems for these HRO characteristics is the first step in reducing accidents caused by human and organization factors (HOF). The Safety Management Assessment System (SMAS) was developed specifically to as sess marine systems (offshore platforms, marine terminals, ships) for HOF. SMAS is a screening method that selects and trains operators of the system to conduct a self-assessment. The assessment process takes five days and ha s the assessors making comparisons and evaluating HOF by selecting ranges a nd providing comments to capture the uncertainty. Included in the process i s a visit to the system. A computer program was developed to assist in the assessment process. A field test of SMAS was conducted at a marine terminal in California. Two teams, with members from the terminal and the regulator y agency, along with a facilitator, were selected and trained. These two in dependent teams conducted separate evaluations on the same marine terminal. A comparison of their assessments showed that the use of ranges and commen ts were very helpful. An analysis of field test data shows that SMAS can pr oduce results more consistent than randomness, SMAS shows promise as an eff icient and practical method to assess humans and organizations. (C) 1999 El sevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.