O. Catuneanu et al., RECIPROCAL ARCHITECTURE OF BEARPAW T-R SEQUENCES, UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS, WESTERN CANADA SEDIMENTARY BASIN, Bulletin of Canadian petroleum geology, 45(1), 1997, pp. 75-94
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Energy & Fuels","Geosciences, Interdisciplinary","Engineering, Petroleum
The Bearpaw Formation consists of marine shale, siltstone and minor sa
ndstone, and represents the final widespread marine unit in the Wester
n Canada Foreland Basin. It is of late Campanian-early Maastrichtian a
ge and forms the core of a second-order transgressive-regressive (T-R)
sequence, The area of study covers the southern parts of Alberta and
Saskatchewan. Within the Bearpaw Formation, up to 11 third-order T-R s
equences have been delineated, These T-R sequences are bounded by suba
erial unconformities and/or conformable transgressive surfaces. The re
cognition of a maximum flooding surface allows each sequence to be sub
divided into a transgressive systems tract (TST) and a regressive syst
ems tract (RST). Two distinct types of third-order T-R sequences were
recognized in the Bearpaw Formation and each is found in a geographica
lly restricted area. Type A sequences are characterized by a thin TST
and thick RST, and they occur in the southwestern part of the study ar
ea, proximal to the orogenic belt. Type B sequences are characterized
by a thick TST and a thin RST and occur to the northeast in a distal s
ector. The line of demarcation between the proximal and distal sectors
is termed a hinge line. Correlative bentonite beds and biostratigraph
ic data indicate that the conformable transgressive surfaces of the pr
oximal sequences correlate with the maximum flooding surfaces of the d
istal sequences and vice-versa. This reciprocal architecture for the s
equences is best explained by a tectonic control on the foreland basin
stratigraphy through the flexural compensation of the lithosphere in
response to successive cycles of orogenic loading and quiescence. Duri
ng tectonic loading the proximal area would experience increased subsi
dence and transgression (TST), whereas the distal area would undergo r
educed subsidence and uplift (RST), During the following quiescence st
age the proximal region would subside less and in part be uplifted (RS
T), At this time the distal area would experience increased subsidence
and decreased sediment influx (TST). The hinge line migrated a short
distance closer to the orogen and slightly northward during Bearpaw de
position. This is consistent with the tectonic regime of dextral trans
gression in the Canadian Cordillera during the latest Cretaceous. The
third-order sequences of the Bearpaw Formation provide solid evidence
for the dominance of tectonic control for sequence boundary generation
and indicate that the flexural tectonic model for foreland basins is
valid.