World-city literature often relies on a priori assumptions rather than quan
tifiable measures to discern the global urban hierarchy. In search of compa
rable international indicators, many studies use the corporate headquarters
of multinational corporations (MNCs) as primary locational data. Recognizi
ng that MNCs play a dominant role in the global economy, we argue that reli
ance on headquarters locations alone distorts the contours of the urban hie
rarchy. The method overstates the importance of urban, centers in the devel
oped countries and economies dominated by large corporations; conversely, i
t underestimates the importance of lower-level circuits of regional communi
cation, transaction centers in developing countries, and cities in less-cen
tralized economies. This bias is not simply a technical matter: it asserts
the power of the core economies, while understating the diversity and compl
exity of global interactions. We propose to include MNC first-level subsidi
ary locations in a more refined measure of world-city status.