The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does not state whether a former e
mployee may sue a former employer regarding post-employment fringe benefits
. Some courts have held that former employees who are retired or have total
disabilities have no right to relief under the statute because they do not
meet the ADA's requirement that a claimant be a "qualified individual with
a disability." Other courts have concluded that former employees receiving
post-employment benefits do have a right to relief under the statute. Thes
e courts reasoned that an internal ambiguity in the statute requires courts
to look to the legislative history and purpose of the ADA, and construe th
e statute in accord with its broad remedial purpose. This Comment argues th
at post-employment benefits recipients have a right to relief under the ADA
. The ADA expressly prohibits discrimination in terms, conditions, and priv
ileges of employment; individuals must have legal recourse when faced with
this type of discrimination. By broadly construing the employment relations
hip to include individuals who no longer work but continue to receive benef
its from a former employer, the "qualified individual with a disability" re
quirement is satisfied and does not stand as an artificial barrier to relie
f under the ADA.